[Click here for the full PDF article]
By Michael Roberts
This work explores the moral status of laws prohibiting bestiality and whether they are justified in practice or justifiable in theory. Part I of the paper introduces us to bestiality by first testing our moral intuitions regarding the act. Through a list of 10 examples we are asked to consider whether we find some acts morally wrong, and therefore prohibitable by law. Next, the paper explores the current state of the law. It considers possible definitions of bestiality from the Church, secular law, and legal scholars. Each definition is criticized as overly broad, vague, and in at least one case, too narrow. Instead, a new definition of bestiality is proposed which better comports with our moral intuitions and eliminates some problems associated with the prior definitions. Read on.